Biogen Presents Phase 2 CELIA Data at AAIC Demonstrating Meaningful Clinical Outcomes and Robust Tau Reduction with Diranersen in Early Alzheimer’s Disease

  • Clinical outcomes: Diranersen demonstrated efficacy across all studied doses at 18 months, with consistent results across multiple prespecified clinical endpoints; the 60 mg dose showed the strongest response with slowing of clinical decline on the cognitive endpoints—42% on ADAS-Cog13 and 50% on MMSE—alongside a 26% slowing on CDR-SB
  • Biomarker response: Diranersen is the first tau-directed therapy to demonstrate robust reductions in both CSF total tau, with mean reductions of 50–65%, and brain tau pathology, as measured by PET, across all studied doses in a Phase 2 study
  • Dose response: CDR-SB results favored diranersen versus placebo across all studied doses; higher doses were not associated with greater slowing of decline
  • Mechanism of action: Distinct from other tau-lowering approaches, diranersen targets MAPT mRNA to reduce the production of all tau isoforms, lowering both intracellular and extracellular tau protein

CAMBRIDGE, Mass., July 14, 2026 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Biogen Inc. (Nasdaq: BIIB) today announced data from the Phase 2 CELIA study evaluating diranersen, an investigational antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) therapy targeting tau, in individuals with early Alzheimer’s disease. The data, presented at the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference (AAIC) 2026, expand upon previously reported topline results and demonstrate a combination of meaningful clinical efficacy and robust biomarker effects, providing Phase 2 proof of concept for diranersen’s tau-directed mechanism of action. Based on the growing and consistent body of evidence from the Phase 1b and Phase 2 studies, Biogen plans to advance diranersen into confirmatory Phase 3 development.1

“The CELIA data provide some of the clearest evidence that reducing tau pathology can translate into clinically meaningful benefit,” said Professor Cath Mummery, Professor of Clinical Neurology at the UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology and Consultant Neurologist at University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. “The magnitude of tau reduction and cognitive benefit observed in CELIA is among the most compelling reported to date in Alzheimer’s disease drug development and supports advancing diranersen to Phase 3 development.”

“The CELIA clinical, biomarker, and safety data presented at AAIC provide proof of concept and important evidence of diranersen’s novel tau-reduction mechanism of action translating into clinical benefit. If confirmed in Phase 3, diranersen could represent an important new therapeutic approach targeting one of the core pathologies of Alzheimer's disease,” said Priya Singhal, M.D., M.P.H., Executive Vice President and Head of Development at Biogen. “Patients and families urgently need new approaches that address the complexity of Alzheimer’s disease. We look forward to working with health authorities and the broader Alzheimer’s community as diranersen advances to Phase 3.”

Diranersen demonstrated efficacy across all studied doses at 18 months, with consistent efficacy across multiple prespecified secondary endpoints, including the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB), a global measure of cognition and daily function; ADAS-Cog13 and MMSE, measures of cognition; modified iADRS and ADCOMS, composite measures of cognition, function, and disease progression; as well as the individual cognitive and functional domains of CDR-SB. Diranersen 60 mg administered intrathecally every six months (n=60) showed the strongest response at 18 months. Compared with placebo (n=115), diranersen 60 mg demonstrated slowing of clinical decline by 0.54 points (26%) on CDR-SB; 42% on ADAS-Cog13; 50% on MMSE; 30% on modified iADRS; and 23% on ADCOMS. The majority of these endpoint differences achieved nominal statistical significance compared with placebo.

Clinical effects were also observed in the other studied dose regimens. Compared with placebo, diranersen 115 mg administered intrathecally every six months (n=115) and diranersen 115 mg administered intrathecally every three months (n=116) demonstrated slowing of clinical decline by 0.28 and 0.18 points (14% and 9%) on CDR-SB; 32% and 29% on ADAS-Cog13; 34% and 38% on MMSE; 29% and 18% on modified iADRS; and 21% and 7% on ADCOMS, respectively. At 18 months, no separation from placebo was observed across dose groups on ADCS-ADL-MCI, a measure of daily functioning, and longer-term follow-up continues to assess whether a longer duration of diranersen therapy impacts this endpoint. Of note, while ADCS-ADL-MCI results were inconsistent across dose regimens, slowing of functional decline based on the functional domains of CDR-SB favored diranersen across all studied doses.  

CELIA was designed with a primary endpoint of dose response on CDR-SB at 18 months to investigate whether higher doses of diranersen could provide greater clinical benefit. As previously disclosed, this was not observed, and the study did not meet its primary endpoint.

Diranersen demonstrated target engagement and robust reductions in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) total tau across all studied doses, with mean reductions of 50–65% from baseline. In the tau PET imaging substudy (n=131), decreases from baseline were seen across all evaluated brain regions for all diranersen doses. Diranersen is the first tau-directed therapy to demonstrate reductions in both CSF total tau and brain tau pathology, as measured by PET, across all studied doses in a Phase 2 study.

Diranersen was generally well tolerated. During the placebo-controlled period, most participants who experienced adverse events had events that were mild or moderate in severity, non-serious, and did not result in treatment discontinuation or study withdrawal. The most frequent adverse events were procedural pain, post-lumbar puncture syndrome, and confusional state. Most adverse events of confusional state occurred within a few days of dosing and resolved within a week. Among participants who completed the placebo-controlled period, more than 90% elected to continue into the extension study. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) are not anticipated with diranersen based on its tau-targeting mechanism of action, and the results from CELIA are consistent with that expectation.

The study enrolled a population representative of early Alzheimer’s disease, with baseline characteristics generally balanced across treatment groups. Participants had a mean age of 68 years, 51% were female, and 60% were classified as having mild cognitive impairment, with 40% having mild Alzheimer’s disease dementia. ApoE4 carriers represented approximately 69% of participants, including 23% homozygotes.

Additional analyses and data from CELIA and the ongoing long-term extension study will be presented at future scientific conferences.