British deaths raise questions about Afghan police
By ELENA BECATOROS and DEB RIECHMANN
Associated Press Writers
KABUL (AP) - The killing of five British troops by a rogue
Afghan policeman underlines concerns about training and discipline
within the ranks and possible insurgent infiltration of a police
force that the U.S. hopes will be its ticket out of Afghanistan
someday.
The attack caused anguish in Britain, where public support for
the war has been waning. Britain is the largest contributor to NATO
forces in Afghanistan after the United States, and its continued
presence here is central to President Barack Obama's strategy as he
weighs dispatching tens of thousands more U.S. troops.
The five British soldiers, who had been advising Afghan
policemen, were shot and killed Tuesday at a checkpoint where they
were living in the volatile southern province of Helmand. Another
six soldiers were wounded, as were two Afghan policemen when the
soldiers returned fire, officials said.
The gunman escaped and his motive was unclear.
The incident, which echoed two police shootings of U.S. soldiers
last year, raised questions about whether international forces are
trying to recruit and train Afghan police too quickly.
``There isn't a lot of vetting of police before they are
hired,'' Peter Galbraith, the former top American official at the
U.N. mission in Afghanistan, told BBC Radio 4.
In September, Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., called for increasing
the size of the Afghan army and police ``much faster than presently
planned'' instead of sending tens of thousands more Americans to
fight here.
In Washington, Defense Department press secretary Geoff Morrell
defended Afghan forces and the international training effort, a
main part of the U.S. strategy for the war.
``However tragic and criminal this act was, it represents a rare
and, luckily, thus far isolated incident. (NATO) troops continue to
partner effectively with the Afghan national security forces and
continue to build their capacity to take the lead in ultimately
defending their country on their own.''
In October 2008, a policeman threw a grenade and opened fire on
a U.S. foot patrol, killing one soldier. The previous month, a
policeman opened fire at a police station, killing a soldier and
wounding three before he was fatally shot.
Training and operating jointly with Afghan police and soldiers,
as the British were doing Tuesday, are key to NATO's strategy of
dealing with the spreading Taliban-led insurgency and, ultimately,
allowing international forces to leave Afghanistan.
But obstacles are far greater with the police than with the
army.
A Defense Department Inspector General report, released in
September, found that Afghan police are crippled by serious
corruption and subject citizens to frequent street-level
``shake-downs.'' Senior officials lack control of their personnel
and do not routinely monitor job performance, the report said.
``Unlike the Afghan National Army, which is the most respected
institution in the Afghan government, there is a wide consensus
that many elements of the Afghan National Police are too corrupt,
and too tied to politics and power brokers,'' former Pentagon
analyst Anthony Cordesman wrote last month.
``Realistic efforts to shake out new units, give them continuity
of effective leadership, deal with internal tensions and retention
problems, and help them overcome the pressures of corruption and
power brokers take time,'' Cordesman said.
Afghan President Hamid Karzai sought not to highlight the Afghan
policeman's role in the deaths of the five British soldiers. His
first statement condemning the attack said it was carried out by a
member of the national police. A corrected statement, released
about an hour later, didn't mention the police at all.
Downplaying the incident, Karzai's spokesman Humayun Hamidzada
called it an isolated attack.
``In the U.S., people shoot up people in a shopping mall,''
Hamidzada told The Associated Press. ``There are crazy people
everywhere.''
However, Karzai's main challenger in the recent election, former
foreign minister Abdullah Abdullah, said the ongoing violence
showed Karzai's administration has failed to stabilize the country
despite eight years of assistance from international forces.
``In the absence of a credible and reliable and legitimate
partner, more soldiers, more resources'' are needed to fight the
war, entering its ninth year, Abdullah told reporters.
In London, Prime Minister Gordon Brown, trying to rally support
for the war, warned against judging the entire Afghan police force
on this one incident. The latest deaths bring the British death
toll in the war to 229.
Hours before Tuesday's attack was made public, a senior Labor
figure, former Foreign Office minister Kim Howells, broke with
Brown and called for a phased withdrawal of British forces, arguing
that the money could be better spent protecting Britain's borders.
Afterward, Howells said the shootings show how hard it will be
for Britain and the U.S. to bring the Afghan army and police to the
point where they can provide their own security.
``This is a real blow because it strikes right at the heart of
that policy,'' he said.
Last month, Brown announced plans to send another 500 British
troops to add to the 9,000 already in Afghanistan. But as
fatalities rise, public support for the war has fallen. That has
prompted British military officers, who normally avoid the
limelight, to take the unusual step of publicly urging Brown to
increase the number of troops even more.
Brown told the House of Commons that although evidence was still
being gathered, ``the Taliban have claimed responsibility for this
incident.'' However, his office was unable to provide details of
any specific statement made by the Taliban.
Lt. Col. David Wakefield, spokesman for the British forces in
Helmand, said the assailant was ``possibly acting in conjunction
with one other'' when he opened fire at the checkpoint in the
Nad-e-Ali district.
The Interior Ministry's head of the criminal investigation
police, Jamil Jumbish, said the attacker joined the local force
about 18 months ago and was from Helmand.
A Helmand police official said authorities searched through the
night and on Wednesday for the attacker. He said the assailant had
graduated from a regional police academy.
The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because of the
sensitivity of the case, said the motive was unclear.
Associated Press Writers Amir Shah and Heidi Vogt in Kabul, Noor
Khan in Kandahar, Jennifer Quinn, David Stringer, Danica Kirka,
Gregory Katz and Jill Lawless in London, and Pauline Jelinek in
Washington contributed to this report.
11/04/09 21:20
© Copyright The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained In this news report may not be published, broadcast or otherwise distributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.